Am 20.03.2017 13:43, schrieb Constantine Kharlamov:
Aah, I see… Should I resend again?
Mhhhmmm,
I think it should be smarter for the committer and I do not have that
right ;-)
Marek your turn?
Who is the 'man' for older cards?
On 20.03.2017 15:40, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Constantine,
you mis
Aah, I see… Should I resend again?
On 20.03.2017 15:40, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> Constantine,
> you missed my
>
> 1/1
> Tested-by: Dieter Nützel
> 1/2
> Acked-by: Dieter Nützel
>
> they should be appended under your Signed-off-by during resend/rebase.
>
> Anyway, looks good.
> Dieter
>
> PS ..
Constantine,
you missed my
1/1
Tested-by: Dieter Nützel
1/2
Acked-by: Dieter Nützel
they should be appended under your Signed-off-by during resend/rebase.
Anyway, looks good.
Dieter
PS ...Dieter's comment... is enough ;-)
Am 20.03.2017 13:19, schrieb Constantine Kharlamov:
The second check
The second check in the old code looked pretty much unreachable, esp.
because it's not obvious that "max_entries" could be zero. To find out
that it was intentional I had to run some checks, and to dig into
the old versions of the file.
So, rewrite the check to make the intention clear.
v2: s/r60
