On 21 July 2017 at 14:37, Daniel Stone wrote:
> Hi Miguel,
>
> On 18 July 2017 at 21:49, Miguel A. Vico wrote:
>> Although we've always made backwards compatible changes to wl_egl_window, we
>> are lacking of a versioning mechanism for EGL drivers that take a native
>> wl_egl_window to check what
Hi Miguel,
On 18 July 2017 at 21:49, Miguel A. Vico wrote:
> Although we've always made backwards compatible changes to wl_egl_window, we
> are lacking of a versioning mechanism for EGL drivers that take a native
> wl_egl_window to check what set of features are exposed/available by the given
> s
Although we've always made backwards compatible changes to wl_egl_window, we
are lacking of a versioning mechanism for EGL drivers that take a native
wl_egl_window to check what set of features are exposed/available by the given
struct.
This series of patches aim to make wl_egl_window a versioned
