On 26/03/15 16:36, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 25/03/15 19:58, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 25/03/15 19:35, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 25/03/15 15:21, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 25/03/15 14:53, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 24 March 2015 at 21:16, Jose Fonseca wrote:
There doesn't seem much interest on osmesa on Win
On 25/03/15 19:58, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> On 25/03/15 19:35, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 25/03/15 15:21, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>> On 25/03/15 14:53, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 24 March 2015 at 21:16, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> There doesn't seem much interest on osmesa on Windows, particularly
> c
On 25/03/15 19:35, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 25/03/15 15:21, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On 25/03/15 14:53, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 24 March 2015 at 21:16, Jose Fonseca wrote:
There doesn't seem much interest on osmesa on Windows, particularly
classic osmesa.
If there is indeed interest in osmesa on Win
On 25/03/15 15:21, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> On 25/03/15 14:53, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 24 March 2015 at 21:16, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>> There doesn't seem much interest on osmesa on Windows, particularly
>>> classic osmesa.
>>>
>>> If there is indeed interest in osmesa on Windows, we should instead
On 25/03/15 14:53, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 24 March 2015 at 21:16, Jose Fonseca wrote:
There doesn't seem much interest on osmesa on Windows, particularly classic
osmesa.
If there is indeed interest in osmesa on Windows, we should instead
integrate src/gallium/targets/osmesa into SCons.
Afaic
On 24 March 2015 at 21:16, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> There doesn't seem much interest on osmesa on Windows, particularly classic
> osmesa.
>
> If there is indeed interest in osmesa on Windows, we should instead
> integrate src/gallium/targets/osmesa into SCons.
Afaict the Octave people still use it.
There doesn't seem much interest on osmesa on Windows, particularly classic
osmesa.
If there is indeed interest in osmesa on Windows, we should instead
integrate src/gallium/targets/osmesa into SCons.
---
src/mesa/drivers/SConscript| 2 --
src/mesa/drivers/osmesa/SConscript | 39 ---
