On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Chad Versace
wrote:
>>> + *x = unpack_1x8((uint8_t) (u & 0xff));
>>> + *y = unpack_1x8((uint8_t) (u >> 8));
>>> + *z = unpack_1x8((uint8_t) (u >> 16));
>>> + *w = unpack_1x8((uint8_t) (u >> 24));
>>> +}
>>
>> The bitmask (u & 0xff) confused me for a few mo
On 01/25/2013 11:38 AM, Chad Versace wrote:
> On 01/24/2013 07:47 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
>> That is, evaluate constant expressions for the following functions:
>> packSnorm4x8, unpackSnorm4x8
>> packUnorm4x8, unpackUnorm4x8
>> ---
>> src/glsl/ir_constant_expression.cpp | 162
>> +
On 24 January 2013 19:47, Matt Turner wrote:
> That is, evaluate constant expressions for the following functions:
> packSnorm4x8, unpackSnorm4x8
> packUnorm4x8, unpackUnorm4x8
> ---
> src/glsl/ir_constant_expression.cpp | 162
> +++
> 1 files changed, 162 in
That is, evaluate constant expressions for the following functions:
packSnorm4x8, unpackSnorm4x8
packUnorm4x8, unpackUnorm4x8
---
src/glsl/ir_constant_expression.cpp | 162 +++
1 files changed, 162 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/glsl/ir_constan
