On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 01:32:20PM -0500, Patrick Baggett wrote:
> The only difference I could see is that in the old code you passed
> &cb->buffer (which maybe points to a value?) directly into u_upload_data()
> where as in the new code, you do pass &cb->buffer as the parameter rbuffer
> to r600_u
The only difference I could see is that in the old code you passed
&cb->buffer (which maybe points to a value?) directly into u_upload_data()
where as in the new code, you do pass &cb->buffer as the parameter rbuffer
to r600_upload_const_buffer(), but then inside that function, you do
*rbuffer = NU
From: Tom Stellard
---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/r600_buffer.c | 31 +
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/radeonsi_compute.c | 26 ++---
src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state.c | 29 +++
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 35 d
