Reviewed-by: Jason Ekstrand
Let's add the perf numbers and get this pushed.
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>>> Before, we would only do scheduling after regi
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> Before, we would only do scheduling after register allocation if we
>> spilled, despite the fact that the pre-RA scheduler was only supposed to
>> be for register pressure and set the
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:38 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> On
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:32 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> Before, w
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
Before, we would only do scheduling after register allocation if we
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>>> Before, we would only do scheduling after register allocation if we
>>> spilled, despite the fact that the pre-RA scheduler was
On Sat, Oct 3, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
>> Before, we would only do scheduling after register allocation if we
>> spilled, despite the fact that the pre-RA scheduler was only supposed to
>> be for register pressure and set the l
On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 2:37 PM, Connor Abbott wrote:
> Before, we would only do scheduling after register allocation if we
> spilled, despite the fact that the pre-RA scheduler was only supposed to
> be for register pressure and set the latencies of every instruction to
> 1. This meant that unless
Before, we would only do scheduling after register allocation if we
spilled, despite the fact that the pre-RA scheduler was only supposed to
be for register pressure and set the latencies of every instruction to
1. This meant that unless we spilled, which we rarely do, then we never
considered inst
