On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Neil Roberts wrote:
> Is this patch necessary? I think the read buffer is part of the
> framebuffer state so any meta function that binds its own framebuffer
> won't need to save the read buffer, right? This is the case for
> _mesa_meta_CopyImageSubData_uncompresse
Is this patch necessary? I think the read buffer is part of the
framebuffer state so any meta function that binds its own framebuffer
won't need to save the read buffer, right? This is the case for
_mesa_meta_CopyImageSubData_uncompressed which binds both a read and
write FBO so I think it shouldn'
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand
---
src/mesa/drivers/common/meta.c | 13 +
src/mesa/drivers/common/meta.h | 4
src/mesa/drivers/common/meta_blit.c | 3 ++-
3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/common/meta.c b/src/mesa/drivers/c
