This failed to take basevertex into account:
If basevertex < 0:
(end + basevertex) might actually be in-bounds while 'end' is not.
We would have clamped in this case when we probably shouldn't.
This could break application drawing.
If basevertex > 0:
'end' might be in-bounds while (en
Am 08.02.2012 14:08, schrieb Kenneth Graunke:
> This failed to take basevertex into account:
>
> If basevertex < 0:
>(end + basevertex) might actually be in-bounds while 'end' is not.
>We would have clamped in this case when we probably shouldn't.
>This could break application drawing.
On 02/08/2012 06:08 AM, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
This failed to take basevertex into account:
If basevertex< 0:
(end + basevertex) might actually be in-bounds while 'end' is not.
We would have clamped in this case when we probably shouldn't.
This could break application drawing.
If b
This failed to take basevertex into account:
If basevertex < 0:
(end + basevertex) might actually be in-bounds while 'end' is not.
We would have clamped in this case when we probably shouldn't.
This could break application drawing.
If basevertex > 0:
'end' might be in-bounds while (en
