- Original Message -
> Am 27.02.2012 21:26, schrieb Jose Fonseca:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:50:43PM -0800, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> - Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Sat, Fe
Am 27.02.2012 21:26, schrieb Jose Fonseca:
>
>
> - Original Message -
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:50:43PM -0800, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> - Original Message -
- Original Message -
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Jose Fonseca
>
> wrot
- Original Message -
> On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:50:43PM -0800, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > >
> > >
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Jose Fonseca
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > - Original Message -
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 01:50:43PM -0800, Jose Fonseca wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message -
> >
> >
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Jose Fonseca
> > > wrote:
> > > > - Original Message -
> > > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jose Fonseca
- Original Message -
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Jose Fonseca
> > wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jose Fonseca
> > >>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > Dave,
> > >> >
> > >> > Ideally there should be on
- Original Message -
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Jose Fonseca
> wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> >> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jose Fonseca
> >>
> >> wrote:
> >> > Dave,
> >> >
> >> > Ideally there should be only one lp_build_mod() which will
> >> > invoke
> >> > L
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jose Fonseca
>> wrote:
>> > Dave,
>> >
>> > Ideally there should be only one lp_build_mod() which will invoke
>> > LLVMBuildSRem or LLVMBuildURem depending on the value of
>> >
- Original Message -
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jose Fonseca
> wrote:
> > Dave,
> >
> > Ideally there should be only one lp_build_mod() which will invoke
> > LLVMBuildSRem or LLVMBuildURem depending on the value of
> > bld->type.sign. The point being that this allows the same code
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 9:46 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote:
> Dave,
>
> Ideally there should be only one lp_build_mod() which will invoke
> LLVMBuildSRem or LLVMBuildURem depending on the value of bld->type.sign. The
> point being that this allows the same code generation logic to seemingly
> target
Dave,
Ideally there should be only one lp_build_mod() which will invoke LLVMBuildSRem
or LLVMBuildURem depending on the value of bld->type.sign. The point being
that this allows the same code generation logic to seemingly target any type
without having to worry too much which target it is targ
From: Dave Airlie
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie
---
src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_arit.c | 28 +++
src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_arit.h | 10 +
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/gallium/auxiliary/gallivm/lp_bld_ari
11 matches
Mail list logo