On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Nanley Chery wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 07:54:23AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> > The Vulkan driver was originally written under the assumption that
> > VK_ATTACHMENT_UNUSED was basically just for depth-stencil attachments.
> > However, the way things fell
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 07:54:23AM -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> The Vulkan driver was originally written under the assumption that
> VK_ATTACHMENT_UNUSED was basically just for depth-stencil attachments.
> However, the way things fell together, VK_ATTACHMENT_UNUSED can be used
> anywhere in the s
The Vulkan driver was originally written under the assumption that
VK_ATTACHMENT_UNUSED was basically just for depth-stencil attachments.
However, the way things fell together, VK_ATTACHMENT_UNUSED can be used
anywhere in the subpass description. The blorp-based clear and resolve
code has a bunch
