On Sat, 2014-02-22 at 15:33 +, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 22/02/14 13:52, Brian Paul wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Emil Velikov
> > wrote:
> >> + case PIPE_CAP_ACCELERATED:
> >> + return 0;
> >> + case PIPE_CAP_VIDEO_MEMORY: {
> >> + /* XXX: Do we want to return the f
On 22/02/14 15:33, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 22/02/14 13:52, Brian Paul wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Emil Velikov
>> wrote:
[snip]
>>> --- a/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_screen.c
>>> +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_screen.c
>>> @@ -245,6 +245,31 @@ llvmpipe_get_param(struct p
On 22/02/14 13:52, Brian Paul wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>
>> Both drivers report 0x as vendor/device id, and the maximum
>> amount of system memory as video memory. We might want to reconsider
>> the latter.
>>
>> Cc: Brian Paul
>> Signed-off-by: Emil V
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Both drivers report 0x as vendor/device id, and the maximum
> amount of system memory as video memory. We might want to reconsider
> the latter.
>
> Cc: Brian Paul
> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
> ---
> src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/l
Am 22.02.2014 04:04, schrieb Emil Velikov:
> Both drivers report 0x as vendor/device id, and the maximum
> amount of system memory as video memory. We might want to reconsider
> the latter.
>
> Cc: Brian Paul
> Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
> ---
> src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_screen.c
Both drivers report 0x as vendor/device id, and the maximum
amount of system memory as video memory. We might want to reconsider
the latter.
Cc: Brian Paul
Signed-off-by: Emil Velikov
---
src/gallium/drivers/llvmpipe/lp_screen.c | 25 +
src/gallium/drivers/softpi
