On Fri, 2016-02-26 at 07:41 +0100, Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:51:16AM +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> > This is needed to allow invalid qualifier checks on inputs.
> >
> > Cc: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
> > ---
> > I missed this in the first series as no tests
On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 11:51:16AM +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> This is needed to allow invalid qualifier checks on inputs.
>
> Cc: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
> ---
> I missed this in the first series as no tests hit this, I guess that means
> we have no gs tests that have an input block wit
This is needed to allow invalid qualifier checks on inputs.
Cc: Samuel Iglesias Gonsálvez
---
I missed this in the first series as no tests hit this, I guess that means
we have no gs tests that have an input block with a layout qualifier :(
Transform feedback qualifiers I'm adding do a simila