Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/9] intel: Don't flush the old context in intelMakeCurrent

2017-11-03 Thread Mark Janes
Dylan pushed this series through our CI, and there were no regressions. Emil Velikov writes: > [removing Neil's old email as it bounces] > > On 2 November 2017 at 19:01, Adam Jackson wrote: >> From: Neil Roberts >> >> It shouldn't be necessary to flush the context within the driver >> implemen

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/9] intel: Don't flush the old context in intelMakeCurrent

2017-11-02 Thread Emil Velikov
[removing Neil's old email as it bounces] On 2 November 2017 at 19:01, Adam Jackson wrote: > From: Neil Roberts > > It shouldn't be necessary to flush the context within the driver > implementation because the old context is explicitly flushed in > _mesa_make_current which is called a little fur

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/9] intel: Don't flush the old context in intelMakeCurrent

2017-11-02 Thread Adam Jackson
From: Neil Roberts It shouldn't be necessary to flush the context within the driver implementation because the old context is explicitly flushed in _mesa_make_current which is called a little further on. It is useful to only have a single place that flushes when switching contexts to make it easi