On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Tom Stellard wrote:
> Hi Marek,
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 05:31:51AM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> Hi Tom,
>>
>> First I'd like to say that even though I don't agree with the
>> direction you're taking, I'd be okay with it for initial bring-up of
>> the compute su
Hi Marek,
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 05:31:51AM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Hi Tom,
>
> First I'd like to say that even though I don't agree with the
> direction you're taking, I'd be okay with it for initial bring-up of
> the compute support.
>
> I am not in favor of using radeon_surface for plain
Hi Tom,
First I'd like to say that even though I don't agree with the
direction you're taking, I'd be okay with it for initial bring-up of
the compute support.
I am not in favor of using radeon_surface for plain untyped 1D
buffers, where the only thing that really matters is the buffer
alignment,
From: Tom Stellard
This function creates a buffer with an associated radeon_surface that
can be used as a RAT.
---
src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_buffer.c | 69
src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_pipe.h | 2 +
src/gallium/drivers/r600/r600_resource.h | 5 +++
s
