On Sun 02 Oct 2016, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:51:20 PM PDT Chad Versace wrote:
> > Cacheing the signal status complicates the code for questionable
> > performance benefit. I added the cacheing long ago, and I now think it
> > was the wrong decision.
> >
> > When w
On Tuesday, September 27, 2016 11:51:20 PM PDT Chad Versace wrote:
> Cacheing the signal status complicates the code for questionable
> performance benefit. I added the cacheing long ago, and I now think it
> was the wrong decision.
>
> When we later add support for fences based on sync fds (that
Cacheing the signal status complicates the code for questionable
performance benefit. I added the cacheing long ago, and I now think it
was the wrong decision.
When we later add support for fences based on sync fds (that is, a fd
backed by struct sync_file in Linux 4.8), the cacheing becomes even
