Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/5] st/nine: Remove all usage of ureg_SUB in nine_ff

2017-01-06 Thread Marek Olšák
On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 12:43 PM, Jose Fonseca wrote: > I think this is a good idea. > > We still use them but I'm happy to see them go > > It would be much easier for you and for us if you just implemented a > ureg_ABS() / ureg_SUB inline helper that would call ureg_MOV/ureg_ADD > internally: few

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/5] st/nine: Remove all usage of ureg_SUB in nine_ff

2017-01-06 Thread Jose Fonseca
I think this is a good idea. We still use them but I'm happy to see them go It would be much easier for you and for us if you just implemented a ureg_ABS() / ureg_SUB inline helper that would call ureg_MOV/ureg_ADD internally: fewer chances of a typo somewhere, and less work necessary all ar

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 2/5] st/nine: Remove all usage of ureg_SUB in nine_ff

2016-12-31 Thread Marek Olšák
From: Axel Davy This is required to remove gallium SUB. Signed-off-by: Axel Davy --- src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/nine_ff.c | 40 +++ 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/state_trackers/nine/nine_ff.c b/src/gallium/state_tr