On 09/15/2017 05:40 PM, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
On Thursday 14 September 2017, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
On 09/13/2017 06:34 PM, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2017, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
When binding a new pipeline, we applied all dynamic states
without checking if they real
On Thursday 14 September 2017, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
>
> On 09/13/2017 06:34 PM, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
> > On Wednesday 13 September 2017, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
> >> When binding a new pipeline, we applied all dynamic states
> >> without checking if they really need to be re-emitted. This
> >>
On 09/13/2017 06:34 PM, Fredrik Höglund wrote:
On Wednesday 13 September 2017, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
When binding a new pipeline, we applied all dynamic states
without checking if they really need to be re-emitted. This
doesn't seem to be useful for the meta operations because only
the viewpo
On Wednesday 13 September 2017, Samuel Pitoiset wrote:
> When binding a new pipeline, we applied all dynamic states
> without checking if they really need to be re-emitted. This
> doesn't seem to be useful for the meta operations because only
> the viewports/scissors are updated.
>
> This should r
When binding a new pipeline, we applied all dynamic states
without checking if they really need to be re-emitted. This
doesn't seem to be useful for the meta operations because only
the viewports/scissors are updated.
This should reduce the number of commands added to the IB
when a new graphics pi
