On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 08:34 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:22:28AM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 17:12 +0200, Bruno Jimenez wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > To which failure are you refering? Could you please send me a
> > > test/program that I can try to
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 11:22:28AM -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 17:12 +0200, Bruno Jimenez wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > To which failure are you refering? Could you please send me a
> > test/program that I can try to track this down?
>
> well, the compute_memory_finalize_pending() f
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 17:12 +0200, Bruno Jimenez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> To which failure are you refering? Could you please send me a
> test/program that I can try to track this down?
well, the compute_memory_finalize_pending() function can possibly return
-1 so it's prudent to check for it.
as for th
Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely
CC: Bruno Jimenez
---
The failure now hits assertion compute_memory_pool.c:408, instead of
u_inlines.h:275:pipe_buffer_map_range: Assertion `offset < buffer->width0'
src/gallium/drivers/r600/evergreen_compute.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletio
Hi,
To which failure are you refering? Could you please send me a
test/program that I can try to track this down?
Thanks!
Bruno
On Thu, 2014-06-19 at 10:21 -0400, Jan Vesely wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Jan Vesely
> CC: Bruno Jimenez
> ---
>
> The failure now hits assertion compute_memory_pool.c:4