Reviewed-by: Dylan Baker
Quoting Mathieu Bridon (2018-07-05 06:17:46)
> We're trying to write a unicode string (i.e decoded) to a file opened
> in binary (i.e encoded) mode.
>
> In Python 2 this works, because of the automatic conversion between
> byte and unicode strings.
>
> In Python 3 this
Quoting Mathieu Bridon (2018-07-06 02:34:56)
> On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 09:14 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> > Does it make more sense to encode, or to use io.open and open the
> > file in text mode? I've gone back and forth on this myself several
> > times.
>
> Same here, both seem equally valid and I
On Thu, 2018-07-05 at 09:14 -0700, Dylan Baker wrote:
> Does it make more sense to encode, or to use io.open and open the
> file in text mode? I've gone back and forth on this myself several
> times.
Same here, both seem equally valid and I can't really make my mind up
on which one to pick.
The g
Does it make more sense to encode, or to use io.open and open the file in text
mode? I've gone back and forth on this myself several times.
Quoting Mathieu Bridon (2018-07-05 06:17:46)
> We're trying to write a unicode string (i.e decoded) to a file opened
> in binary (i.e encoded) mode.
>
> In P
We're trying to write a unicode string (i.e decoded) to a file opened
in binary (i.e encoded) mode.
In Python 2 this works, because of the automatic conversion between
byte and unicode strings.
In Python 3 this fails though, as no automatic conversion is attempted.
This change makes the scripts
