A very dangerous convention, IMO... it turns into infinite loops and
other oddness in release builds. Should really just be done when it's
really unreachable. (Perhaps that's the case here, dunno.)
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 11:21 PM, Chris Forbes wrote:
> Recent convention has been to use unreachab
Recent convention has been to use unreachable("str") rather than assert(!"str")
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> ---
> src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_vp.cpp | 9 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_vp.cpp | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_vp.cpp
b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_vp.cpp
index 92d1085..dcbd240 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_vp.cpp
+++ b/src/
