On Monday, June 30, 2014 10:20:13 AM Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 09:33:51PM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> > I never bothered implementing the disassembler for Gen7+ URB opcodes, so
> > we were just disassembling them as Ironlake/Sandybridge ones. This
> > looked pretty bad
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 09:33:51PM -0700, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> I never bothered implementing the disassembler for Gen7+ URB opcodes, so
> we were just disassembling them as Ironlake/Sandybridge ones. This
> looked pretty bad when running Paul's GS EndPrimitive tests, as the
> "write OWord" mes
I never bothered implementing the disassembler for Gen7+ URB opcodes, so
we were just disassembling them as Ironlake/Sandybridge ones. This
looked pretty bad when running Paul's GS EndPrimitive tests, as the
"write OWord" message was decoded at ff_sync, which doesn't exist.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth
