On 2018-05-09 08:20:59, Scott D Phillips wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Jordan Justen
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 2018-05-07 17:30:43, Scott D Phillips wrote:
> >> > From: Jason Ekstrand
> >> >
> >> > This is simple linear-walk first-fit allocator roughly base
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Jordan Justen
> wrote:
>
>> On 2018-05-07 17:30:43, Scott D Phillips wrote:
>> > From: Jason Ekstrand
>> >
>> > This is simple linear-walk first-fit allocator roughly based on the
>> > allocator in the radeon winsys code. This allocator
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 10:58 AM, Jordan Justen
wrote:
> On 2018-05-07 17:30:43, Scott D Phillips wrote:
> > From: Jason Ekstrand
> >
> > This is simple linear-walk first-fit allocator roughly based on the
> > allocator in the radeon winsys code. This allocator has two primary
> > functional dif
On 2018-05-07 17:30:43, Scott D Phillips wrote:
> From: Jason Ekstrand
>
> This is simple linear-walk first-fit allocator roughly based on the
> allocator in the radeon winsys code. This allocator has two primary
> functional differences:
>
> 1) It cleanly returns 0 on allocation failure
>
>
From: Jason Ekstrand
This is simple linear-walk first-fit allocator roughly based on the
allocator in the radeon winsys code. This allocator has two primary
functional differences:
1) It cleanly returns 0 on allocation failure
2) It allocates addresses top-down instead of bottom-up.
The sec
