On 07.06.2016 20:26, Ian Romanick wrote:
On 06/07/2016 07:26 AM, Juha-Pekka Heikkila wrote:
ralloc originally had had idea of using malloc but somehow
had slipped in calloc. Without these changes rzalloc did double
job of zeroing the memory, first calloc and then memset.
Now change ralloc to use
On 06/07/2016 07:26 AM, Juha-Pekka Heikkila wrote:
> ralloc originally had had idea of using malloc but somehow
> had slipped in calloc. Without these changes rzalloc did double
> job of zeroing the memory, first calloc and then memset.
> Now change ralloc to use malloc, leave rzalloc to use calloc
ralloc originally had had idea of using malloc but somehow
had slipped in calloc. Without these changes rzalloc did double
job of zeroing the memory, first calloc and then memset.
Now change ralloc to use malloc, leave rzalloc to use calloc and
make needed changes in ralloc functions to get things
