On 4 October 2011 09:41, Kenneth Graunke wrote:
> On 10/04/2011 07:00 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> >
> > I'm guessing you could eventually get rid of the brw_count_bits()
> > wrapper altogether at some point.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Brian Paul
>
> I'd be glad to see that go, too.
>
> Reviewed-by: Kennet
On 10/04/2011 07:00 AM, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 10/03/2011 04:11 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
>> The i965 driver already had a function to do this (brw_count_bits()),
>> but it was buggy (it only counted the bottom 32 bits) and it was
>> clumsy (it had a strange and broken fallback for non-GCC-like
>> comp
On 10/03/2011 04:11 PM, Paul Berry wrote:
The i965 driver already had a function to do this (brw_count_bits()),
but it was buggy (it only counted the bottom 32 bits) and it was
clumsy (it had a strange and broken fallback for non-GCC-like
compilers, which fortunately was never used). Since Mesa
The i965 driver already had a function to do this (brw_count_bits()),
but it was buggy (it only counted the bottom 32 bits) and it was
clumsy (it had a strange and broken fallback for non-GCC-like
compilers, which fortunately was never used). Since Mesa already has
a _mesa_bitcount() function, it
