Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/5] u_format: Fix bit definition of UF10_MANTISSA_BITS.

2011-10-28 Thread Ian Romanick
On 10/26/2011 04:46 PM, Eric Anholt wrote: This is only used in the code for packing to INF, and resulted in an extra bit set that was set anyway, so it was harmless except for the confusion caused. There Mesa fixes and the piglit test look good. Reviewed-by: Ian Romanick --- src/gallium/

Re: [Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/5] u_format: Fix bit definition of UF10_MANTISSA_BITS.

2011-10-26 Thread Marek Olšák
This series is: Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák Thanks. Marek On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Eric Anholt wrote: > This is only used in the code for packing to INF, and resulted in an > extra bit set that was set anyway, so it was harmless except for the > confusion caused. > --- >  src/gallium/aux

[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 1/5] u_format: Fix bit definition of UF10_MANTISSA_BITS.

2011-10-26 Thread Eric Anholt
This is only used in the code for packing to INF, and resulted in an extra bit set that was set anyway, so it was harmless except for the confusion caused. --- src/gallium/auxiliary/util/u_format_r11g11b10f.h |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/aux