On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:29:53 -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> On 10/25/2011 03:58 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > The intel driver (and gallium, it looks like, though it doesn't use
> > these texstore functions at this point) doesn't bother making storage
> > for textures with 0 width, height, or depth. Thi
On 10/25/2011 03:58 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
The intel driver (and gallium, it looks like, though it doesn't use
these texstore functions at this point) doesn't bother making storage
for textures with 0 width, height, or depth. This avoids them having
to deal with returning a mapping for that none
The intel driver (and gallium, it looks like, though it doesn't use
these texstore functions at this point) doesn't bother making storage
for textures with 0 width, height, or depth. This avoids them having
to deal with returning a mapping for that nonexistent data.
Fixes assertion failures with
