On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> The series is
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Turner
>
> I think It should be tagged for the stable branch as well. Does anyone
> else have an opinion?
Yes, I'll tag them for stable and send to mesa-stable.
I left an unused pci-id (0x591A) in Mesa but I
On Tue, Sep 5, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> The series is
>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Turner
>
> I think It should be tagged for the stable branch as well. Does anyone
> else have an opinion?
>
> I tested a KBL-R system (the 0x5917 PCI ID) with it set as a GT1.5 and
> a GT2 and in both cases i
The series is
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner
I think It should be tagged for the stable branch as well. Does anyone
else have an opinion?
I tested a KBL-R system (the 0x5917 PCI ID) with it set as a GT1.5 and
a GT2 and in both cases is passed piglit.
Are you planning to send patches for the kernel a
These PCI IDs are not used in any Kabylake SKUs.
Signed-off-by: Anuj Phogat
---
include/pci_ids/i965_pci_ids.h | 7 ---
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/pci_ids/i965_pci_ids.h b/include/pci_ids/i965_pci_ids.h
index 57e70b7..5c42712 100644
--- a/include/pci_ids/i965_pci_id
