Yes, that sounds good. We should always support the latest stable
version of LLVM, but I don't think it's worth supporting anything
older than that.
It's also important to have the latest LLVM because it's sometimes the
only way to get the new features which are mentioned in the release
notes of M
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 03:37:02AM +0200, Marek Olšák wrote:
> From: Marek Olšák
>
> Needed by ARB_draw_indirect.
I think we should come up with a rule for how long we should support
older versions of LLVM. Do you have any thoughts about this? I was
thinking we could have each Mesa release sup
From: Marek Olšák
Needed by ARB_draw_indirect.
---
configure.ac | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 4646212..9d5cd89 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -1888,8 +1888,9 @@ radeon_llvm_check() {
AC_MSG_ERR
