On Sat, Dec 8, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> Hi Jerome,
>
> I'm okay with the simplification of r600_flush_emit, I'm not so okay
> with some other things. There's also some cruft unrelated to flushing.
>
> 1) R600_CONTEXT_FLUSH could have a better name, because it's not clear
> what it doe
Hi Jerome,
I'm okay with the simplification of r600_flush_emit, I'm not so okay
with some other things. There's also some cruft unrelated to flushing.
1) R600_CONTEXT_FLUSH could have a better name, because it's not clear
what it does. (it looks like it only flushed read-only bindings)
2) Don't
From: Jerome Glisse
This bring r600g allmost inline with closed source driver when
it comes to flushing and synchronization pattern.
Signed-off-by: Jerome Glisse
---
src/gallium/drivers/r600/evergreen_compute.c | 8 +-
.../drivers/r600/evergreen_compute_internal.c | 4 +-
src/ga
