On Tue, 03 Jan 2012 19:19:16 -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 06:52 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > The current implementation was totally broken -- it was looking in an
> > unpopulated structure for varyings, and trying to do so using the
> > current list of varying names, not the list used
On 3 January 2012 19:19, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 01/03/2012 06:52 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
>> The current implementation was totally broken -- it was looking in an
>> unpopulated structure for varyings, and trying to do so using the
>> current list of varying names, not the list used at link tim
On 01/03/2012 06:52 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
The current implementation was totally broken -- it was looking in an
unpopulated structure for varyings, and trying to do so using the
current list of varying names, not the list used at link time.
---
src/glsl/linker.cpp | 37
The current implementation was totally broken -- it was looking in an
unpopulated structure for varyings, and trying to do so using the
current list of varying names, not the list used at link time.
---
src/glsl/linker.cpp | 37 +++--
src/mesa/main/m
