On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 11:01 PM Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2019-01-08 20:17:01)
> > On Tuesday, January 8, 2019 3:11:37 AM PST Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-01-08 11:03:26)
> > > > Hi Andrii,
> > > >
> > > > Although I think what these patches do ma
Quoting Kenneth Graunke (2019-01-08 20:17:01)
> On Tuesday, January 8, 2019 3:11:37 AM PST Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-01-08 11:03:26)
> > > Hi Andrii,
> > >
> > > Although I think what these patches do makes sense, I think it's missing
> > > the bigger picture.
> > >
On Tuesday, January 8, 2019 3:11:37 AM PST Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-01-08 11:03:26)
> > Hi Andrii,
> >
> > Although I think what these patches do makes sense, I think it's missing
> > the bigger picture.
> > There is a lot more state that gets lost if we have to rever
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 6:16 PM Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Quoting andrey simiklit (2019-01-08 16:00:45)
> > On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 1:11 PM Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-01-08 11:03:26)
> > > Hi Andrii,
> > >
> > > Although I think what these patches do
Quoting andrey simiklit (2019-01-08 16:00:45)
> On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 1:11 PM Chris Wilson wrote:
>
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-01-08 11:03:26)
> > Hi Andrii,
> >
> > Although I think what these patches do makes sense, I think it's missing
> > the bigger picture.
>
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 1:11 PM Chris Wilson
wrote:
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-01-08 11:03:26)
> > Hi Andrii,
> >
> > Although I think what these patches do makes sense, I think it's missing
> > the bigger picture.
> > There is a lot more state that gets lost if we have to revert all of the
On 08/01/2019 11:11, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-01-08 11:03:26)
Hi Andrii,
Although I think what these patches do makes sense, I think it's missing
the bigger picture.
There is a lot more state that gets lost if we have to revert all of the
emitted commands.
A quick loo
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-01-08 11:03:26)
> Hi Andrii,
>
> Although I think what these patches do makes sense, I think it's missing
> the bigger picture.
> There is a lot more state that gets lost if we have to revert all of the
> emitted commands.
> A quick look at brw_upload_pipeline_sta
Hi Andrii,
Although I think what these patches do makes sense, I think it's missing
the bigger picture.
There is a lot more state that gets lost if we have to revert all of the
emitted commands.
A quick look at brw_upload_pipeline_state() shows all of the programs
could be invalid as well, or
Hi all,
Could somebody take a look at this patch?
Regards,
Andrii.
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 11:19 PM wrote:
> From: Andrii Simiklit
>
> This patch is needed to avoid missing 3DSTATE_URB_* commands in a batch
> after
> rollback operation.
>
> To be able to test easily this issue
> the following
From: Andrii Simiklit
This patch is needed to avoid missing 3DSTATE_URB_* commands in a batch after
rollback operation.
To be able to test easily this issue
the following workaround is necessary:
-if (!brw_batch_has_aperture_space(brw, 0)) {
by:
+if (true) {
in brw_draw_single_prim function.
Th
11 matches
Mail list logo
