On Sat, Sep 27, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> My attempts to clarify the code with _compacted/_uncompacted prefixed
> variables apparently failed. Hopefully this is clearer.
Heh. Maybe the 'shift' variables could use a better names? (compact_shift?)
Regardless, series
Reviewed-by: Jorda
My attempts to clarify the code with _compacted/_uncompacted prefixed
variables apparently failed. Hopefully this is clearer.
In any case, the previous code wasn't clear enough to gcc to let it
optimize division by a power of two into a shift. No problems now.
Also, the previous code (in the ADD
