Looks good. Thanks for the updates.
Jose
- Original Message -
> From: Roland Scheidegger
>
> We had to disable fast rsqrt before because it wasn't precise enough etc.
> However in situations when we know we're not going to need more precision
> we can still use a fast rsqrt (which can b
From: Roland Scheidegger
We had to disable fast rsqrt before because it wasn't precise enough etc.
However in situations when we know we're not going to need more precision
we can still use a fast rsqrt (which can be several times faster than
the quite expensive sqrt). Hence introduce a new helpe
Am 11.07.2013 16:13, schrieb Brian Paul:
> Just minor things below.
Ok, I'll fix this (and the things Jose mentioned).
>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Paul
>
> On 07/10/2013 06:21 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
>> From: Roland Scheidegger
>>
>> We had to disable fast rsqrt before because it wasn't preci
Just minor things below.
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul
On 07/10/2013 06:21 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
We had to disable fast rsqrt before because it wasn't precise enough etc.
However in situations when we know we're not going to need more precision
we can still use a f
From: Roland Scheidegger
We had to disable fast rsqrt before because it wasn't precise enough etc.
However in situations when we know we're not going to need more precision
we can still use a fast rsqrt (which can be several times faster than
the quite expensive sqrt). Hence introduce a new helpe
