Am 07.03.2018 um 11:34 schrieb Jose Fonseca:
> On 06/03/18 20:52, Brian Paul wrote:
>> Looks good. That certainly does simplify things. Two minor
>> suggestions below.
>>
>> In any case, for both, Reviewed-by: Brian Paul
>
> Looks great cleanup to me too. Just minor issues inline. Both are
>
On 06/03/18 20:52, Brian Paul wrote:
Looks good. That certainly does simplify things. Two minor
suggestions below.
In any case, for both, Reviewed-by: Brian Paul
Looks great cleanup to me too. Just minor issues inline. Both are
Reviewed-by: Jose Fonseca
On 03/06/2018 01:34 PM, srol...
Am 06.03.2018 um 21:52 schrieb Brian Paul:
> Looks good. That certainly does simplify things. Two minor suggestions
> below.
>
> In any case, for both, Reviewed-by: Brian Paul
>
> On 03/06/2018 01:34 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
>> From: Roland Scheidegger
>>
>> The motivation actually was t
Looks good. That certainly does simplify things. Two minor suggestions
below.
In any case, for both, Reviewed-by: Brian Paul
On 03/06/2018 01:34 PM, srol...@vmware.com wrote:
From: Roland Scheidegger
The motivation actually was to get rid of the additional tex
instruction, since that requ
From: Roland Scheidegger
The motivation actually was to get rid of the additional tex
instruction, since that requires the draw fallback code to intercept
all sampler / view calls (even if the fallback is never hit).
Basically, the idea is to use coverage of the pixel to calculate
the alpha value
