Marek Olšák wrote:
OpenSUSE is (was?) shipping r300g with LLVM disabled. Can you believe it?
Poor users with SWTCL chipsets... and bad reputation for us too.
---
configure.ac |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 8989c2b..
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Dan Nicholson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> >> OpenSUSE is (was?) shipping r300g with LLVM disabled. Can you believe
> it?
> >> Poor users with SWTCL chipsets... and bad
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 8:52 AM, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
>> OpenSUSE is (was?) shipping r300g with LLVM disabled. Can you believe it?
>> Poor users with SWTCL chipsets... and bad reputation for us too.
>> ---
>> configure.ac | 4 ++--
>> 1 fi
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> OpenSUSE is (was?) shipping r300g with LLVM disabled. Can you believe it?
> Poor users with SWTCL chipsets... and bad reputation for us too.
> ---
> configure.ac | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Marek Olšák wrote:
> OpenSUSE is (was?) shipping r300g with LLVM disabled. Can you believe it?
> Poor users with SWTCL chipsets... and bad reputation for us too.
Both patches look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Alex Deucher
> ---
> configure.ac | 4 ++--
> 1 file
OpenSUSE is (was?) shipping r300g with LLVM disabled. Can you believe it?
Poor users with SWTCL chipsets... and bad reputation for us too.
---
configure.ac |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index 8989c2b..8e9f73f 100644
--- a/co
