On 7 December 2016 at 14:38, Eero Tamminen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There are quite a few bugs in FDO bugzilla which mention glx-tls,
> you could list few of them in the commit message, e.g. this one:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72902
>
Good point - we have dozens of these, wher
Hi,
There are quite a few bugs in FDO bugzilla which mention glx-tls,
you could list few of them in the commit message, e.g. this one:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72902
- Eero
On 06.12.2016 20:51, Emil Velikov wrote:
On 6 December 2016 at 14:36, Andreas Boll
On 6 December 2016 at 14:36, Andreas Boll wrote:
> 2016-12-05 20:02 GMT+01:00 Emil Velikov :
>> From: Emil Velikov
>>
>> In the (not too) distant future we'd want to remove this option and
>> effectively drop the other codepath(s) we have in our dispatch.
>>
>> Linux distributions have been using
2016-12-05 20:02 GMT+01:00 Emil Velikov :
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> In the (not too) distant future we'd want to remove this option and
> effectively drop the other codepath(s) we have in our dispatch.
>
> Linux distributions have been using --enable-glx-tls for a number of
> years. Some/most BSD p
Emil Velikov writes:
> From: Emil Velikov
>
> In the (not too) distant future we'd want to remove this option and
> effectively drop the other codepath(s) we have in our dispatch.
>
> Linux distributions have been using --enable-glx-tls for a number of
> years. Some/most BSD platforms still don'
From: Emil Velikov
In the (not too) distant future we'd want to remove this option and
effectively drop the other codepath(s) we have in our dispatch.
Linux distributions have been using --enable-glx-tls for a number of
years. Some/most BSD platforms still don't support this, yet this should
ser
