Ian Romanick writes:
>> For what it's worth, I'm strongly in favour of using these
>> kernel-style lists instead of exec_list. The kernel ones seem much
>> less confusing.
>
> Huh? They're practically identical. The only difference is the
> kernel-style lists have a single sentinel node, and that
On 05/05/2015 11:21 AM, Neil Roberts wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
>> +static inline bool list_empty(struct list_head *list)
>> +{
>> + return list->next == list;
>> +}
>
> It would be good if list.h also included stdbool.h in order to get the
> declaration of bool. However, will that caus
On 05/05/2015 12:21 PM, Neil Roberts wrote:
Jason Ekstrand writes:
+static inline bool list_empty(struct list_head *list)
+{
+ return list->next == list;
+}
It would be good if list.h also included stdbool.h in order to get the
declaration of bool. However, will that cause problems on MSVC
On Tue, May 5, 2015 at 11:21 AM, Neil Roberts wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
>> +static inline bool list_empty(struct list_head *list)
>> +{
>> + return list->next == list;
>> +}
>
> It would be good if list.h also included stdbool.h in order to get the
> declaration of bool. However, will t
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> +static inline bool list_empty(struct list_head *list)
> +{
> + return list->next == list;
> +}
It would be good if list.h also included stdbool.h in order to get the
declaration of bool. However, will that cause problems on MSVC? Is the
Gallium code compiled on MSVC i
---
src/util/list.h | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/src/util/list.h b/src/util/list.h
index 6144b0c..246f826 100644
--- a/src/util/list.h
+++ b/src/util/list.h
@@ -92,6 +92,19 @@ static inline void list_delinit(struct list_head *item)
item->prev = item;
}
