On 4 December 2016 at 08:04, Bas Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
>> From: Dave Airlie
>>
>> This isn't fully what we want yet, but is a good step on the way.
>>
>> This allows the compiler to create the information structures
>> for the state setting si
On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 5:19 AM, Dave Airlie wrote:
> From: Dave Airlie
>
> This isn't fully what we want yet, but is a good step on the way.
>
> This allows the compiler to create the information structures
> for the state setting side, however the state setting still expects
> things to be pret
From: Dave Airlie
This isn't fully what we want yet, but is a good step on the way.
This allows the compiler to create the information structures
for the state setting side, however the state setting still expects
things to be pretty much in 2 sgpr wide register sets, and can't
handle the indire
