Jason Ekstrand writes:
> On Jul 24, 2015 8:02 AM, "Francisco Jerez" wrote:
>>
>> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Francisco Jerez
> wrote:
>> >> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>> >>
>> >>> On Jul 24, 2015 4:00 AM, "Francisco Jerez"
> wrote:
>>
>> Jason Ekstra
On Jul 24, 2015 8:02 AM, "Francisco Jerez" wrote:
>
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Francisco Jerez
wrote:
> >> Jason Ekstrand writes:
> >>
> >>> On Jul 24, 2015 4:00 AM, "Francisco Jerez"
wrote:
>
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > Ok, I've loo
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Francisco Jerez
> wrote:
>> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>>
>>> On Jul 24, 2015 4:00 AM, "Francisco Jerez" wrote:
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> Ok, I've looked through this again and convinced myself that it's
> *mostly*
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 7:39 AM, Francisco Jerez wrote:
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
>> On Jul 24, 2015 4:00 AM, "Francisco Jerez" wrote:
>>>
>>> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>>>
>>> > Ok, I've looked through this again and convinced myself that it's
>>> > *mostly* correct. I am a bit skeptical of the
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> On Jul 24, 2015 4:00 AM, "Francisco Jerez" wrote:
>>
>> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>>
>> > Ok, I've looked through this again and convinced myself that it's
>> > *mostly* correct. I am a bit skeptical of the address swizzling for
>> > Y-major tiling.
>> >
>> > I've also in
On Jul 24, 2015 4:00 AM, "Francisco Jerez" wrote:
>
> Jason Ekstrand writes:
>
> > Ok, I've looked through this again and convinced myself that it's
> > *mostly* correct. I am a bit skeptical of the address swizzling for
> > Y-major tiling.
> >
> > I've also included some comments that I'd like
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> Ok, I've looked through this again and convinced myself that it's
> *mostly* correct. I am a bit skeptical of the address swizzling for
> Y-major tiling.
>
> I've also included some comments that I'd like to see added (assuming
> they're correct). Sometimes it's easier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Am 21.07.2015 um 18:38 schrieb Francisco Jerez:
> Define a function to calculate the memory address of the image
> location given by a vector of coordinates. This is required in
> cases where we need to fall back to untyped surface access, which
Ok, I've looked through this again and convinced myself that it's
*mostly* correct. I am a bit skeptical of the address swizzling for
Y-major tiling.
I've also included some comments that I'd like to see added (assuming
they're correct). Sometimes it's easier to write helpful comments if
the per
On Wed 22 Jul 2015, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> This needs a *lot* more commentary. These calculations are extremely
> tricky and there are almost no comments. For instance, you are
> turning a 2D offset on a tiled surface into a new 2D address into the
> raw view of the surface. Nowhere do you expl
Jason Ekstrand writes:
> This needs a *lot* more commentary. These calculations are extremely
> tricky and there are almost no comments. For instance, you are
> turning a 2D offset on a tiled surface into a new 2D address into the
> raw view of the surface. Nowhere do you explain what the "raw
This needs a *lot* more commentary. These calculations are extremely
tricky and there are almost no comments. For instance, you are
turning a 2D offset on a tiled surface into a new 2D address into the
raw view of the surface. Nowhere do you explain what the "raw"
surface looks like and how its
Define a function to calculate the memory address of the image
location given by a vector of coordinates. This is required in cases
where we need to fall back to untyped surface access, which take a raw
memory offset and know nothing about surface coordinates, type
conversion or memory tiling and
13 matches
Mail list logo
