I just landed the first 6 patches as well as a fix for one intel compiler
bug uncovered by the series. You can go ahead and rebase your former
series. If you feel the need for a separate 32-bit version of
compute_fast_udiv_info, I'll happily reivew the patch.
--Jason
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 11:1
Quoting Jason Ekstrand (2018-10-05 21:10:14)
> While I generally trust rediculousfish to have done his homework, we've
> made some adjustments to suite the needs of mesa and it'd be good to
^
suit
> test those. Also, there's no better plac
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 1:52 PM Marek Olšák wrote:
> With my comments addressed, patches 2 - 6 are:
>
> Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
>
Thanks! Unfortunately, the tests require patch 1 so it'd be nice if that
got review by someone. I'd also be happy to pull in someone else's more
vetted code for la
With my comments addressed, patches 2 - 6 are:
Reviewed-by: Marek Olšák
Since I will need to compute the division terms during draw calls, I
may need to switch the math to uint32_t for my case (e.g. via a C++
template).
Marek
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 12:11 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>> While I ge
On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 12:11 AM Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> While I generally trust rediculousfish to have done his homework, we've
> made some adjustments to suite the needs of mesa and it'd be good to
> test those. Also, there's no better place than unit tests to clearly
> document the different
While I generally trust rediculousfish to have done his homework, we've
made some adjustments to suite the needs of mesa and it'd be good to
test those. Also, there's no better place than unit tests to clearly
document the different edge cases of the different methods.
---
configure.ac
