On 3 November 2015 at 17:27, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> On 3 November 2015 at 00:29, Matt Turner wrote:
>>> Put fields that are meaningless with an immediate in the same storage
>>> with the immediate.
>> There is something funky here. Should it b
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 2:38 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 3 November 2015 at 00:29, Matt Turner wrote:
>> Put fields that are meaningless with an immediate in the same storage
>> with the immediate.
> There is something funky here. Should it be
>
> "Put fields that are meaningless _without_ an imm
On 3 November 2015 at 00:29, Matt Turner wrote:
> Put fields that are meaningless with an immediate in the same storage
> with the immediate.
There is something funky here. Should it be
"Put fields that are meaningless _without_ an immediate in the same storage
_as_ the immediate..."
-Emil
_
Put fields that are meaningless with an immediate in the same storage
with the immediate. This leaves fields type, file, nr, subnr in the
first dword where there's now extra room for expansion.
---
src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_reg.h | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deleti
