On 04/30/2014 06:59 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> On 04/29/2014 08:43 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
From: Ian Romanick
This code was broken in some odd ways before. Too much state was
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 12:11 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> On 04/29/2014 08:43 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>>> From: Ian Romanick
>>>
>>> This code was broken in some odd ways before. Too much state was being
>>> saved, it was being restored in the w
On 04/29/2014 08:43 PM, Chia-I Wu wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
>> From: Ian Romanick
>>
>> This code was broken in some odd ways before. Too much state was being
>> saved, it was being restored in the wrong order, and in the wrong way.
>> The biggest problem was
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick
>
> This code was broken in some odd ways before. Too much state was being
> saved, it was being restored in the wrong order, and in the wrong way.
> The biggest problem was that the pipeline object was restored before
> r
From: Ian Romanick
This code was broken in some odd ways before. Too much state was being
saved, it was being restored in the wrong order, and in the wrong way.
The biggest problem was that the pipeline object was restored before
restoring the programs attached to the default pipeline.
Fixes a
