On Mon, 2016-11-21 at 18:08 +0200, Andres Gomez wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 16:56 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 19:15 +0200, Andres Gomez wrote:
> ...
> >
> > >
> > > diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser.yy
> > > b/src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser.yy
> > > ind
On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 16:56 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 19:15 +0200, Andres Gomez wrote:
...
> > diff --git a/src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser.yy
> > b/src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser.yy
> > index 50f7097..9f18c15 100644
> > --- a/src/compiler/glsl/glsl_parser.yy
> > +++ b/src/
On Thu, 2016-11-17 at 16:45 +1100, Timothy Arceri wrote:
> I might have asked you this before. Is there a reason why we can't call
> merge_qualifier from merge_into_in_qualifier() like we do
> in merge_into_out_qualifier() to take care of some of these for us?
> Since there is duplicate code.
Ans
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 19:15 +0200, Andres Gomez wrote:
> Currently, the default in layout qualifier merge performs specific
> validation and merge.
>
> We want to split out the validation from the merge so they can be
> done
> independently.
>
> Additionally, for simplification, the direction of
On Mon, 2016-11-14 at 19:15 +0200, Andres Gomez wrote:
> Currently, the default in layout qualifier merge performs specific
> validation and merge.
>
> We want to split out the validation from the merge so they can be
> done
> independently.
>
> Additionally, for simplification, the direction of
Patches 3-4 are:
Reviewed-by: Timothy Arceri
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
Currently, the default in layout qualifier merge performs specific
validation and merge.
We want to split out the validation from the merge so they can be done
independently.
Additionally, for simplification, the direction of the validation and
merge is changed so the ast_type_qualifier calling t
