On Tue, 2017-01-10 at 20:52 -0800, Matt Turner wrote:
> On 01/09, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
> > From: Alejandro Piñeiro
> >
> > Doubles need extra space, so we would need to do a remapping for vec4
> > too in order to take that into account. We reuse the already
> > existing remap_vs_attrs, bu
On 01/09, Juan A. Suarez Romero wrote:
From: Alejandro Piñeiro
Doubles need extra space, so we would need to do a remapping for vec4
too in order to take that into account. We reuse the already
existing remap_vs_attrs, but passing is_scalar, so they could
remap accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alej
From: Alejandro Piñeiro
Doubles need extra space, so we would need to do a remapping for vec4
too in order to take that into account. We reuse the already
existing remap_vs_attrs, but passing is_scalar, so they could
remap accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Alejandro Piñeiro
Signed-off-by: Juan A. Sua