On 07/08/2015 10:07 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Most of the data stored(duplicated) was unused, and for the one that is
> follow the approach set by other drivers.
> This eliminates the use of legacy (dri1) types.
>
> XXX: The radeon code is the only user of __DRIscreen::drm_version (the
> only __DR
On 9 July 2015 at 14:16, Marek Olšák wrote:
> "major != 2" can't occur. You don't have to check the major version at
> all and you can just assume it's always 2.
>
That's even better than expected. Thanks !
-Emil
___
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists
"major != 2" can't occur. You don't have to check the major version at
all and you can just assume it's always 2.
Marek
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 9 July 2015 at 04:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
>> On 09.07.2015 02:07, Emil Velikov wrote:
>>> Most of the data stored(dup
On 9 July 2015 at 04:45, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On 09.07.2015 02:07, Emil Velikov wrote:
>> Most of the data stored(duplicated) was unused, and for the one that is
>> follow the approach set by other drivers.
>> This eliminates the use of legacy (dri1) types.
>
> The commentary below should have b
On 09.07.2015 02:07, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Most of the data stored(duplicated) was unused, and for the one that is
> follow the approach set by other drivers.
> This eliminates the use of legacy (dri1) types.
The commentary below should have been after the --- separator, not in
the actual Git comm
Most of the data stored(duplicated) was unused, and for the one that is
follow the approach set by other drivers.
This eliminates the use of legacy (dri1) types.
XXX: The radeon code is the only user of __DRIscreen::drm_version (the
only __DRIversion outside of dri1 land). Should we move it into r
