On Friday, July 18, 2014 02:16:37 PM Jordan Justen wrote:
> Rather than pointing the surface_state directly at a single
> sub-image of the texture for rendering, we now point the
> surface_state at the top level of the texture, and configure
> the surface_state as needed based on this.
>
> v2:
>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:16:37PM -0700, Jordan Justen wrote:
> Rather than pointing the surface_state directly at a single
> sub-image of the texture for rendering, we now point the
> surface_state at the top level of the texture, and configure
> the surface_state as needed based on this.
>
> v2
Rather than pointing the surface_state directly at a single
sub-image of the texture for rendering, we now point the
surface_state at the top level of the texture, and configure
the surface_state as needed based on this.
v2:
* Use SET_FIELD as suggested by Topi
* Simplify min_array_element assig
