On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 5:23 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Both "issues" were in the original code. But if you feel so strongly about
> them I will have them changed for rev2 of the series.
I mean, you're modifying the lines now, so just squash in a fixup and
be done with it? I don't think there's an
On 28/03/14 21:21, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> Evidently at least static OSMesa is still used as shared one
>> causes substantial increase in the load time for some programs
>> that use it (from seconds up-to ~30min).
>>
>> Rather than forcing ev
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> Evidently at least static OSMesa is still used as shared one
> causes substantial increase in the load time for some programs
> that use it (from seconds up-to ~30min).
>
> Rather than forcing everyone to use shared mesa, revert commit
> a6efb
Evidently at least static OSMesa is still used as shared one
causes substantial increase in the load time for some programs
that use it (from seconds up-to ~30min).
Rather than forcing everyone to use shared mesa, revert commit
a6efbac9fb502c4f0166e7a0680b6828e1f6926c and default to shared
build w
