On November 22, 2017 15:12:20 Grazvydas Ignotas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas
wrote:
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas
> wrote:
>>
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:54 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jason Ekstrand
>> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 1:51 AM, J
On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Jason Ekstrand
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I force-pushed the branch a
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Jason Ekstrand
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I force-pushed the branch again with an added commit: "radv: Move wsi
>> > initialization later in physic
On 11/16/2017 01:28 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
This patch series is the combined brain-child of Dave and myself. The
objective is to rewrite Vulkan WSI to look as much like a layer as possible
and to reduce the driver <-> WSI interface. We try very hard to have as
many of the WSI details as poss
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 5:07 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Jason Ekstrand
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:18 PM, G
On Sun, Nov 19, 2017 at 1:51 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Jason Ekstrand
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I've tested this branch (rx470 + h
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:02 AM, Grazvydas Ignotas
wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Jason Ekstrand
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I've tested this branch (rx470 + hd530) and it's only partially working:
> >> - display on amd, radv:
On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 3:06 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas
> wrote:
>>
>> I've tested this branch (rx470 + hd530) and it's only partially working:
>> - display on amd, radv: always fails with "offscreen:
>> wsi/wsi_common.c:172: select_memory_type:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Grazvydas Ignotas
wrote:
> I've tested this branch (rx470 + hd530) and it's only partially working:
> - display on amd, radv: always fails with "offscreen:
> wsi/wsi_common.c:172: select_memory_type: Assertion `!"No memory type
> found"' failed."
> - display on am
I've tested this branch (rx470 + hd530) and it's only partially working:
- display on amd, radv: always fails with "offscreen:
wsi/wsi_common.c:172: select_memory_type: Assertion `!"No memory type
found"' failed."
- display on amd, anv: misrenders. For SaschaWillems, only
multisampling, subpasses a
I just force-pushed my branch with some changes as per Dave to more
explicitly enable implicit sync when allocating memory objects.
On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Jason Ekstrand
wrote:
> This patch series is the combined brain-child of Dave and myself. The
> objective is to rewrite Vulkan WSI
This patch series is the combined brain-child of Dave and myself. The
objective is to rewrite Vulkan WSI to look as much like a layer as possible
and to reduce the driver <-> WSI interface. We try very hard to have as
many of the WSI details as possible in common code and to use standard
Vulkan i
13 matches
Mail list logo