This is same set as I posted yesterday. I had forgotten to add R-b comments
to commit messages. My apologies Matt. :)
I reworked Ian's patch because my set depend on it and Ian's patch seem to
have vanished in the void. It needed a small update because it was breaking
"make check".
Matt, about "
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:46 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Juha-Pekka Heikkila
> wrote:
>> Again fixed my Klocwork set. I reworked Ian's patch because my set depend on
>> it and Ian's patch seem to have vanished in the void. It needed a small
>> update
>> because it w
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Juha-Pekka Heikkila
wrote:
> Again fixed my Klocwork set. I reworked Ian's patch because my set depend on
> it and Ian's patch seem to have vanished in the void. It needed a small update
> because it was breaking "make check".
I already reviewed a hand-full of the
Again fixed my Klocwork set. I reworked Ian's patch because my set depend on
it and Ian's patch seem to have vanished in the void. It needed a small update
because it was breaking "make check".
Matt, about "glsl: add missing null check in tfeedback_decl::init()",
ralloc_strndup failure would be co
