On 07/04/14 22:10, Juha-Pekka Heikkilä wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 07/04/14 21:06, Juha-Pekka Heikkilä wrote:
>>> Hmm... Wonder where my patches 9..12 vanished. They show in git
>>> send-email as "Result: 250 ok: Message ### accepted". If they don't
>>>
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 11:21 PM, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 07/04/14 21:06, Juha-Pekka Heikkilä wrote:
>> Hmm... Wonder where my patches 9..12 vanished. They show in git
>> send-email as "Result: 250 ok: Message ### accepted". If they don't
>> magically show up here I will resend entire set tomorro
On 07/04/14 21:06, Juha-Pekka Heikkilä wrote:
> Hmm... Wonder where my patches 9..12 vanished. They show in git
> send-email as "Result: 250 ok: Message ### accepted". If they don't
> magically show up here I will resend entire set tomorrow from better
> connection.
>
An innocent bystander type o
Hmm... Wonder where my patches 9..12 vanished. They show in git
send-email as "Result: 250 ok: Message ### accepted". If they don't
magically show up here I will resend entire set tomorrow from better
connection.
/Juha-Pekka
On Mon, Apr 7, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Juha-Pekka Heikkila
wrote:
> Set of p
Set of patches which mostly were here earlier, hope I did not this time miss
any comments. #12 is new to the set. These pass Piglit quick tests with no
regression on my Ivybridge.
/Juha-Pekka
Ian Romanick (1):
mesa: Add _mesa_error_no_memory for logging out-of-memory messages
Juha-Pekka Heikki
